tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13196976.post-1151392318888465472006-06-27T03:11:00.000-04:002006-06-27T03:11:00.000-04:002006-06-27T03:11:00.000-04:00Randy: Ah, but the original press release said "more than five billion searchable <I>names</I>." Methinks the reporter who regurgitated this release mistook the total number of names in all of Ancestry's databases for the number of names in their U.S. Census collection.<BR/><BR/>Andy: Nice catch! I've switched the link to a version of the story written by someone who can subtract.Chrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01386406270744275223noreply@blogger.com