Comments on The Genealogue: Genealogue Challenge #70

My guess for number one is Erwin or Edwin Card. Da...

2007-10-15T17:07:00.000-04:00

My guess for number one is Erwin or Edwin Card. Daughter Ada's census says her father was born in Michigan, and this guy fits the bill. In 1910 he was in Seattle, before any marriage or daughter, and by 1920 he is back in Michigan. Sometime around 1911 to 1913 the big event would have happened.

Yes, but thanks for asking.

2007-10-15T16:38:00.000-04:00

Yes, but thanks for asking.

Nice work! Is it too much to ask for the first nam...

2007-10-15T16:29:00.000-04:00

Nice work! Is it too much to ask for the first names of her husbands?

In 1920 there is a Catherine Card living in Seattl...

2007-10-15T13:08:00.000-04:00

In 1920 there is a Catherine Card living in Seattle. She is 27, divorced and living with her sister Anna, her daughter Ada, and her mother Esther M. Sheehan, 62. Catherine was born in Montana, her father in New York and her mother in Mass. This corresponds to the age and birthplaces of the person Chris found in 1930. (In 1930, the daughter Ada is still living with her aunt Anna in Seattle.)

In 1900 Esther, both parents born in Ireland, was living with her husband Michael Sheehan and their children including Catherine and Anna in Chouteau county, MT.

In 1860 there is an Esther McCurdy, 2, living in Mass with her father James and her mother Catherine, both born in Ireland. The family had moved to Oswego County, NY by 1880.

Would be sweet to see a marriage for Esther McCurdy to Michael Sheehan, but a posting for this family of McCurdys on Genforum relates that Esther McCurdy did marry Michael Sheehan and they settled in Chouteau county, MT.

Last comment before I sign off for the night. As l...

2007-10-15T02:34:00.000-04:00

Last comment before I sign off for the night. As listed in the 1920 census in Seattle, Kathryn's mother is Esther M. Sheehan. (In 1910, she was Mary.) In 1900 Kathryn's parents are Michael and Esther Sheehan. I can track an Esther McCurdy in the 1860 and 1880 census with the right detail to be the future Mrs. Michael Sheehan. She is born 1858, consistent with the 1920 census entry in which Esther was 62, and born in MA. In the 1880 listing, Esther is counted twice, both times as a 22 year old servant, and both times in New York, though in different counties. A little farther west in New York is a Michael Sheehan. Perhaps it was in western NY where their paths crossed and they became married. All four parents are born in Ireland, consistent with the later Montana listings.

Over and out.

I should mention, too, that Kathryn was enumerated...

2007-10-15T01:54:00.000-04:00

I should mention, too, that Kathryn was enumerated twice in 1910 -- once in Seattle as Katheryne Sheehan, age 17, roomer, and once in Montana as Catherine Sheehan, 18, daughter of Martin. I surmise this to be one and the same person based on the pob of the parents, and also the presence of sister Ann in the Montana enumeration. This is consistent with the 1930 Seattle entry where Ann is listed as the aunt of Kathryn's daughter Ada. In that listing, Ann's parents are born in NY and MA, again, consistent with the other entries.

Your clues are great help and I'm going to say tha...

2007-10-15T01:43:00.000-04:00

Your clues are great help and I'm going to say that Kathryn of 1930 Columbus, OH is Kathryn Card, though I don't have any proofs yet. She appears to be Kathryn Sheehan, daughter of Martin (No, really, Martin Sheehan -- I guess acting runs in the family -- and who would have thought Martin Sheen was a hundred and eighty) and Mary (see 1910 Montana census.) In 1920 she is enumerated as a divorced Kathryn Card in Seattle living with her mother, and also a daughter, Ada. By 1930 when Kathryn is acting in Columbus, Ohio, daughter Ada is still in Seattle living with Kathryn's sister Ann E Cannell. Ann is also a divorcee, so perhaps a little dysfunction in that family. Kathryn and Ann's parents are appropriately born in New York and Massachusetts. Of course, all this neatly fitting evidence could be part of some elaborate hoax you've perpetrated with Ancestry.com. But I'll go with this as my final answer ... for now.